U.S. ports urge end to trade tensions with China
The Port of Los Angeles tells the USTR that consequences of a prolonged trade battle may be severe
Transportation in the News
Intermodal volume declines continue in November, reports IANA Lower demand and volumes drive down FedEx fiscal second quarter earnings Truck tonnage trends down in October, reports American Trucking Associations AAR and STB offer differing views on two final adopted final rules DOT issues NOFO for $1.5 billion in RAISE grants program More Transportation NewsTransportation Resource
Why location infrastructure is the future of logisticsIn this webinar, Nick Patrick, Radar CEO and Co-founder, will explain how modern and logistics innovators are using location infrastructure to drive operational efficiency and deliver amazing customer experiences.All Resources
When theAmerican Association of Port Authorities’ (AAPA)seminar for “Port Governing Boards” convened in San Francisco this week, there was considerable discussion about U.S.-China trade tensions and the implications for our nation’s leading ocean cargo gateways.
Kurt Nagle, AAPA’s President and Chief Executive Officer, noted in his opening remarks that he’d later be expanding on his views on this volatile subject when he addresses the United States Trade Representative on June 21st.
“AAPA is concerned about the overall impact of additional Chinese tariffs on port-related jobs, as well as specific concerns related to ship-to-shore cranes and cargo handling equipment used at ports,” he says, noting that ports are on the front line of the ongoing U.S. trade policy uncertainty.
His comments reiterate last year’s List 3 hearing testimony and emphasize “the veritable tsunami” of this latest list, List 4, which impacts nearly every product imported into the United States from China.
“The expanded 301 tariffs on cargo moving through ports will have significant consequences,” he says. “The total Section 301 tariffs on Chinese commodities and China’s retaliatory responses to date would cover 8.4 percent of trade through America’s ports by value.”
In California alone, the impact could be as much as 20 percent of containerized cargo imported throughout the state, representing $63.6 billion in trade value. Job loss and economic harm can be expected in the maritime sector and throughout the U.S. supply chain that ports support.
Indeed, earlier this week Eugene Seroka, executive director of the Port of Los Angeles, told the USTR that the prolonged tariffs on trade with China may cause shippers to source goods from other countries, thereby shifting container vessels away from the U.S. West Coast.
Seroka will be paying a visit the San Francisco Bay Area when thePacific Transportation Associationstages is annual “Ports and Terminals Luncheon” next week.
The title of his talk is "Growing A Global Gateway: Trade, Technology, and Sustainability at the Port of Los Angeles," but we suspect that he’ll be sharing his views on larger macro-economic issues facing all Pacific Rim shippers this Peak Season.
About the Author
Patrick Burnson, Executive EditorBurnson先生是一个广泛出版作家和editor specializing in international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He is based in San Francisco, where he provides a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. He may be reached at his downtown office:[email protected]Subscribe to Logistics Management Magazine!
Subscribe today. It's FREE!Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!
Read this special report on trade & logistics in Jacksonville, FL to learn how your business can benefit from a reliable supply chain network. Download Today!
Merger and Acquisition Momentum: 2022 Top 20 Warehouses Truckload: Easing back to normal? View More From this Issue